LATEST AGE DISCRIMINATION CASES — age discrimination

Viewing entries in
ECJ

Share

European Commission v Hungary

ECJ says Hungarian law reducing the retirement age for judges, prosecutors and notaries was not justified.

Share

Share

Commission v Hungary

ECJ says Hungarian law reducing the retirement age for judges, prosecutors and notaries was not justified.

Share

Share

Hennigs v Eisenbahn-Bundesamt and Land Berlin v Mai

In these joined decisions, the ECJ has held that a term in a collective agreement which provides that the pay of a public sector employee is determined by reference to their age is unlawful.

Share

Share

Fuchs and anor v Land Hessen

This ECJ decision appears to suggest that costs alone will not be sufficient to justify discrimination.

 

Share

Share

Kücükdeveci v Swedex

A German law restricting the minimum periods of notice for those aged under 25 was found to be discriminatory and unjustified. 

Share

Share

Wolf v Stadt Frankfurt am Main

The ECJ has given their judgement on a German law restricting applications to the fire service to those under 30.

Share

Share

Hütter v Technische Universität Graz

The ECJ rule that an Austrian law which mandated lower pay for younger civil servants was not proportionate and therefore not justified under the Framework Directive.

Share

Share

Palacios de la Villa v Cortefiel Servicios SA

The European Court of Justice has decided that national laws on compulsory retirement at a particular age must be justified in order to be lawful.

Share

Share

Cadman v Health and Safety Executive

In general, employers do not need specifically to justify using length of service to calculate pay, according to the ECJ in Cadman v Health and Safety Executive.

Share